Image shamelessly stolen from Think Progress.
That's simply amazing. They held that "the Iowa statute limiting civil marriage to a union between a man and a woman violates the equal protection clause" of the state constitution. And further added that religious doctrine and views are unaffected by this ruling and a religious denomination could could still define marriage any way they wanted. Thus removing the idea that this decision would force churches to marry whomever appeared at their doorstep.
Wow. Vermont and Iowa in the same week. Who'da thunk.
Of course, the Republican Senate Leader has already stated calling for a constitutional amendment to "protect" traditional marriage and define as between one man and one woman.
Wake up and smell the coffee, ass hat. We're moving on without you.